.
Feedback

'King Kong' Turns 80 This Week!

Connecticut native Sam Hardy played a key role in the original release of the movie classic in March of 1933.

 

The movie "King Kong" is 80 years old this week. Declared "culturally, historically, and aesthetically significant" by the Library of Congress in 1991, the movie was also named one of the country's top 50 films by the American Film Institute (AFI) in 1975. Additionally, in 1998 the AFI ranked "King Kong" at 43rd on its list of the 100 greatest movies of all time.


Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack — both military veterans — conceived the idea of the fantasy-adventure film in 1932, basing the story on the ancient Arabian proverb of "The Beauty and the Beast."

The film centers around the character Carl Denham, an independent filmmaker who is known for shooting films of exotic animals in remote locations. Denham wants his agent, Charles Weston, to recruit a beautiful young woman for his latest project.

Weston is played by actor Sam Hardy — a Connecticut native and Yale grad. Hardy was born in New Haven on March 21, 1883. He died from surgical complications at age 52 on Oct. 16, 1935. 

In the movie, Weston refuses Denham's request: "I can't send a young pretty girl such as you ask on a job like this without telling her what to expect ... To go off on a trip for no one knows how long, to some spot you don't even hint at, the only woman on the ship with the toughest mugs I ever looked at."

As a result of Weston's refusal, Denham wanders the streets of New York City to look for a beautiful woman who is willing to go on an adventure. He finds Ann Darrow, an unemployed, beautiful blonde who is down on her luck. Darrow, pplayed by the Canadian actress Fay Wray, agrees to join Denham.

They travel toward Indonesia by steamer and land on Skull Island. There they encounter a native tribe that desires to give Ann Darrow to Kong as a tribute. When the crew refuses to hand over Darrow, several natives kidnap her, hand her over to King Kong, and the excitement begins, as the crew tries to rescue Darrow.

King Kong, a 50-foot-tall gorilla, takes a fancy to Ann. He kills a T-Rex that wanted Ann for lunch and then defends her again by killing a large snake. Meanwhile, the rescue squad has deadly encounters with both a stegosaurus and a brontosaurus as well as Kong himself. Finally subdued by gas bombs, Kong  is transported back to New York City to be put on display for money.

While chained to a wall in the Big Apple, Kong spies Ann Darrow in the crowd and gets irritated by flashbulbs. He breaks free, grabs Ann, and rampages through the city, eventually deciding to climb the Empire State Building with Ann Darrow in hand. Kong swats down an airplane or two, but is eventually machine-gunned off the world's tallest building and dies, but Ann Darrow survives on a ledge of the building. As Carl Denham arrives at the scene, a policeman says to him, "Well, Denham, the airplanes got him."  To this remark Denham replies, "Oh, no, it wasn't the airplanes. It was Beauty killed the Beast."

"King Kong" runs about 104 minutes. Its total production cost was only about $672,000. Released at the beginning of the Great Depression 80 years ago this week, the movie, nevertheless, earned more than $1.8 million at the box office that year. It was re-released both in 1938 and in 1941, making about another $1 million. Two remakes were filmed — one in 1975; the other in 2005. Both had limited success. The original film of 1933 — with a key character played by Connecticut native Sam Hardy — remains the best and most popular version filmed.  




Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Hampton-Portland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob May 22, 2013 at 02:41 pm
1st of all - LOWER income community's " certainly Is not referring to places such as PortlandRead More or East Hampton so I'm confused why the writer implies it does since clearly it doesn't ! the other comment the writer chooses to include is "society lets kids down" referring to not allocating enough $$$ for supplies or education ..... THIS is JUST CRAZY !!!! on a Larger Level the USA throws more $$ at education thinking it will make a difference when it will not - and the results show it... 2ndly - has anyone that agrees with this Assertion actually ever looked at the Budgets these school systems receive ? it's clear that the majority if our tax $ goes to educators and the system - and it's mainly comes down to a few simple things when we talk about why teachers are taking cash outta their own pockets to buy supplies. it has NOTHING to do with not having the $$ it comes down to - the educators and Dept Leads NOT planning correctly. if they had planned correctly and put it in their HUGE inflated budgets they wouldn't have to go buy things .... Also it cones down to the administrators not working with the boards to put a system in place that if for some reason - something is needed - they have an Avenue To obtain it or get reimbursed for it Easily. So we really need To put a stop to continuing to put a slant on these types of stories - and just start stating the facts. the last thing I find VERY strange is that Nowhere the PTA is mentioned and What a great resource they are !!! The majority of the time these groups have plenty of $$$ ON HAND that they actually need to "" THINK of "" year after year what to do with it all...... they are great groups that really add to the overall assistance to the depts within the schools. last year alone for an example is that our PTO purchased over 1200 dollars in tee shirts for the 1st graders to wear at an Assembly as well as Utilizing their funds to purchase a $800 Color laser printer. So let's all take a step back and Realize Yes maybe our teachers are out there purchasing supplies however It is not due to a lack of funds with in the school systems budgets