.
Feedback

Connecticut Police Departments Discourage Civilian Complaints

A report from the ACLU shows many departments in the state have barriers that make it difficult for civilians to file complaints against officers. In East Hampton, the department follows best practices, the report says.

 

Police departments across Connecticut routinely make it difficult for civilians to file complaints against their officers in a number of ways, including failing to make complaint forms available, refusing to accept anonymous complaints, imposing time limits on receiving complaints and requiring sworn statements or threatening criminal prosecution or a civil lawsuit for false statements.

Those are the findings of a non-scientific survey conducted by the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut and released Tuesday. The barriers to filing complaints that the ACLU cites in the study fly in the face of “best practices that are widely accepted by law enforcement experts,” on the processes police departments should follow for accepting civilian complaints, the agency said.

The findings, the ACLU said in a press release, “reveal a need for statewide standards to ensure that civilians with complaints about police misconduct will not be turned away, intimidated or silenced.”

“We’ve been hearing from too many people who have had difficulty filing complaints with their local police departments,” said David McGuire, staff attorney for the ACLU of Connecticut, who supervised the study. “We rely on the police for our safety, and we’re grateful for their service. But we also entrust police officers with extraordinary authority, including the power to use deadly force, and this must be balanced by accountability, with a clear and reliable method for civilians to register their concerns about police conduct.”

You can view a PDF of the agency's findings above.

In East Hampton, the ACLU found that the police department allows anonymous complaints and has multiple avenues for filing a complaint. The department also was found to follow best practices recommended by law enforcement experts by allowing anonymous complaints and by not calling in immigration officials if they suspect a complainant is in the country illegally.

In Portland, the ACLU found just the opposite. The agency only allows people to make complaints at the station house, will not accept anonymous complaints and will call immigration officials if the complaint is filed by someone police  suspect is in the country illegally.

The ACLU report was based on a telephone survey of 104 Connecticut police departments and agencies, including 92 municipal departments and the state’s 12 police barracks. The survey found that:

Twenty-three percent of municipal police departments (excluding state police) reported having no complaint form for civilians to fill out.

Sixty-one percent of the municipal police agencies in Connecticut told callers they don’t accept anonymous complaints, although law-enforcement policy experts strongly agree that police should accept complaints made anonymously. Another 10 percent could not or would not answer the question about anonymous complaints.

Nearly two-thirds of the complaint forms posted online by municipal police departments in Connecticut contain warnings of criminal prosecution for those making false complaints, though such action is widely considered a deterrent to those with legitimate complaints.

Nearly half the complaint forms posted online by municipal police departments in Connecticut mention a requirement for complainants to file a sworn statement, though law enforcement policy experts recommend strongly against demanding such statements. Employees at several departments without online forms also mentioned the requirement to ACLU callers.

Just a third of the departments in the survey clearly stated that immigration authorities would not be called against a civilian complainant. More than half did not answer or expressed some degree of uncertainty and 15 percent said they would definitely report a complainant to immigration authorities.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Hampton-Portland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Frank April 2, 2013 at 11:02 pm
China will take out NK before we will. Not the US with this Administration.
Big K April 2, 2013 at 07:50 pm
In North Korea we have the Same old S - - T as we had with his Father and Grandfather. If they wantRead More to destroy their country, Bring it on! He is nothing but a BIG MOUTH. I feel sorry for the N. Korean people to have such a jerk as this dictator. It is too bad they don't have a good democracy.
Big K April 2, 2013 at 07:49 pm
In North Korea we have the Same ole S - - T as we had with his Father and Grandfather. If they wantRead More to distroy their country, Bring it on! He is nothing but a BIG MOUTH. I feel sory for the N. Korean people to have such a jerk as this dicttaor. it is too bad they don't have a good democrocy
unknownauthor March 31, 2013 at 01:40 pm
I feel fortunate to have such wonderful neighbors who are so kind, helpful, and look after eachRead More other. Lauren Crowley
Paul Ruimerman March 29, 2013 at 08:16 pm
Why exclude the crime scene photos? If those were released you would see some real gun legislationRead More passed when people saw what those bullets did to those little children. The only unconstitutional laws passed so far are the restrictions the NRA has managed to get passed that make it difficult for the government to even trace stolen weapons. When I was young the NRA taught us how to properly handle weapons. Now the NRA is more concerned with keeping their high paying jobs by feeding their members misinformation. If you are a hunter and need more than one bullet to fell your prey, you need target practice.
Jim in Durham March 28, 2013 at 10:36 pm
Agreed,all of it (except crime scene photos) . There is no prosecution to plan,no reason to keepRead More data secret . It gives the impression that people with a agenda are trying to hide something until possibly unconstitiutional laws are passed . Why no word on his medical conditions ? Does Hippa apply after death ?
jake hobart March 28, 2013 at 08:38 pm
All of it should be made public. Lawmakers are crafting new legislation that is going to affectRead More every person in the state. We have a right to know what these new laws are being based on.