.
Feedback

Middletown Police: Portland Man Charged With Sexual Assault

The arrest last week of Jeffrey M. Fine, owner of Middletown's Meeting House Opticians, brought to light that this is the second time in 13 years he is facing such a felony charge.

 

A well-known local optician, history buff and veterans’ advocate is facing third-degree sexual assault charges related to an alleged incident that took place last June, according to court documents.

, 65, of Fairview Street, Portland, the longtime owner of on Main Street, was picked up on a felony warrant March 13 by the Middletown Police Special Investigations Unit and released on a $75,000 bond.

Fine, who court documents say is married and lists his wife as next of kin, is due in court on March 28 at 10 a.m.

The warrant is sealed but accompanying documents at the Middletown Superior Court’s criminal clerk’s office indicate the alleged assault took place June 28, 2011. Not much more information is available except that the warrant was unsealed only so the bail commissioner, state's attorney, public defender and family relations could review it, then was resealed, according to the clerk's office.

This isn’t the first time such charges were filed against Fine. In October 1998, the Hartford Courant reported, Fine, then 52, was charged with second-degree sexual assault after allegedly molesting a “profoundly deaf” woman who had stopped in his store to rest her back.

According to the Courant, the 58-year-old woman says Fine partially undressed her, sexually molested her and exposed himself to her. She was identified in court documents as Jane Doe.

In April 1999, the victim sued Fine and placed a $200,000 lien on his then-home on Greenwich Court.

According to a consent order filed with the state of Connecticut Department of Public Health, Bureau of Regulatory Services, Fine pleaded no contest to the Sept. 9, 1998, "sexual contact with a female at his place of business." His license was suspended Jan. 4, 2002, and reinstated April 24, 2006.

At the time, Fine agreed to two years of probation, according to the consent order, and completed 16 hours of ethics and boundary issues coursework.

It's unclear if Fine was convicted, according to online records from the Connecticut Judicial Branch. Melissa A. Farley, executive director of the External Affairs Division, says, "For criminal and motor vehicle cases statewide, conviction information is displayed and is available for inquiry on this website for a maximum period of 10 years after the date of conviction."

In 1986, another consent order details, from 1982 to 1985, Fine represented himself as a physician's assistant, changed a contact lens prescription and operated a contact lens mail order business and an Old Saybrook opticians' guild without a license among several other offenses. At the time, Fine was not a licensed optician.

The consent order says Fine was granted a modified optician's license, fined $400 and had his license suspended for five years. On Nov. 5, 1991, the document says, Fine's license was reinstated.

Fine, a Vietnam veteran, is credited with getting the birthplace of U.S. Army , 418-426 Main St., dedicated in 2002 and helping establish the city’s first in the Eckersly-Hall Building at 61 Durant Street — where the city's senior center is slated to move upon completion of the project.

He was an original member of the city's Main Street USA application committee, according to the Hartford Courant, and was an outspoken advocate for the North End revitalization.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Hampton-Portland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob May 22, 2013 at 02:41 pm
1st of all - LOWER income community's " certainly Is not referring to places such as PortlandRead More or East Hampton so I'm confused why the writer implies it does since clearly it doesn't ! the other comment the writer chooses to include is "society lets kids down" referring to not allocating enough $$$ for supplies or education ..... THIS is JUST CRAZY !!!! on a Larger Level the USA throws more $$ at education thinking it will make a difference when it will not - and the results show it... 2ndly - has anyone that agrees with this Assertion actually ever looked at the Budgets these school systems receive ? it's clear that the majority if our tax $ goes to educators and the system - and it's mainly comes down to a few simple things when we talk about why teachers are taking cash outta their own pockets to buy supplies. it has NOTHING to do with not having the $$ it comes down to - the educators and Dept Leads NOT planning correctly. if they had planned correctly and put it in their HUGE inflated budgets they wouldn't have to go buy things .... Also it cones down to the administrators not working with the boards to put a system in place that if for some reason - something is needed - they have an Avenue To obtain it or get reimbursed for it Easily. So we really need To put a stop to continuing to put a slant on these types of stories - and just start stating the facts. the last thing I find VERY strange is that Nowhere the PTA is mentioned and What a great resource they are !!! The majority of the time these groups have plenty of $$$ ON HAND that they actually need to "" THINK of "" year after year what to do with it all...... they are great groups that really add to the overall assistance to the depts within the schools. last year alone for an example is that our PTO purchased over 1200 dollars in tee shirts for the 1st graders to wear at an Assembly as well as Utilizing their funds to purchase a $800 Color laser printer. So let's all take a step back and Realize Yes maybe our teachers are out there purchasing supplies however It is not due to a lack of funds with in the school systems budgets