.
Feedback

East Hampton, Reimondo Named in Lawsuit

Olzacki alleges personal information was shared with those who had no right to know.

Just when it appeared East Hampton might soon get out from under the pile of pending legal matters that have burdened the town the past year, a new complaint has been brought forward.

Michael Olzacki, who was turned down for a position as assistant animal control officer two years ago, has filed a lawsuit against the town and Police Chief Matthew Reimondo.

The lawsuit, which was served on Thursday, comes as no surprise because the town was previously notified by Olzacki of his intent to sue in September.

In the complaint, Olzacki alleges that his personal information was disclosed by Reimondo in a series of emails and attachments to his wife, Kathie Reimondo, parks and recreation director Ruth Plummer, East Hampton librarian Sue Berescik and Renee Ghent, who is not employed by the town. The complaint states that because none of these individuals were relevant to the hiring or review process for the police department’s animal control officer position, they have “no right or privilege to view or have knowledge of private personal data of Town employees or applicants.”

The complaint further alleges that at a town meeting on Oct. 5, 2010, Reimondo made statements disclosing certain personal data about Olzacki.

Exactly what Reomondo said or what personal information he shared in the emails was not disclosed in the complaint.

Olzacki applied for the position of assistant animal control officer in November 2009. During the hiring process, personal information was provided by him and gathered by the police department, which conducted a background investigation. In March 2010, Olzacki received a letter from Reimondo informing him he would not be hired for the ACO position.

Between Oct. 29, 2010, and Nov. 4, 2010, Olzacki submitted Freedom of Information requests to the town for the emails, texts and phone records of Reimondo and Plummer.

This suit followed.

Contacted Tuesday, the attorney for Olzacki, Kenneth Barber, declined comment.

The complaint points to Connecticut General Statutes Section 4-190, saying, “The town of East Hampton maintains a personal data system and is obligated … to preserve the privacy of said personal data,” and to the town’s Employee Handbook as failures on the town’s part to preserve the integrity and privacy of the personal data within its control.

Olzacki is seeking damages for, among other things, injury to his reputation.

Reimondo was not available for comment on Tuesday afternoon.

Olzacki has since been hired as the ACO in East Haddam. He became the ACO in East Hampton this year after the two towns regionalized their animal control services.

The town council will meet in executive session Tuesday night to discuss the matter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Hampton-Portland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bob May 22, 2013 at 02:41 pm
1st of all - LOWER income community's " certainly Is not referring to places such as PortlandRead More or East Hampton so I'm confused why the writer implies it does since clearly it doesn't ! the other comment the writer chooses to include is "society lets kids down" referring to not allocating enough $$$ for supplies or education ..... THIS is JUST CRAZY !!!! on a Larger Level the USA throws more $$ at education thinking it will make a difference when it will not - and the results show it... 2ndly - has anyone that agrees with this Assertion actually ever looked at the Budgets these school systems receive ? it's clear that the majority if our tax $ goes to educators and the system - and it's mainly comes down to a few simple things when we talk about why teachers are taking cash outta their own pockets to buy supplies. it has NOTHING to do with not having the $$ it comes down to - the educators and Dept Leads NOT planning correctly. if they had planned correctly and put it in their HUGE inflated budgets they wouldn't have to go buy things .... Also it cones down to the administrators not working with the boards to put a system in place that if for some reason - something is needed - they have an Avenue To obtain it or get reimbursed for it Easily. So we really need To put a stop to continuing to put a slant on these types of stories - and just start stating the facts. the last thing I find VERY strange is that Nowhere the PTA is mentioned and What a great resource they are !!! The majority of the time these groups have plenty of $$$ ON HAND that they actually need to "" THINK of "" year after year what to do with it all...... they are great groups that really add to the overall assistance to the depts within the schools. last year alone for an example is that our PTO purchased over 1200 dollars in tee shirts for the 1st graders to wear at an Assembly as well as Utilizing their funds to purchase a $800 Color laser printer. So let's all take a step back and Realize Yes maybe our teachers are out there purchasing supplies however It is not due to a lack of funds with in the school systems budgets